51ΑΤΖζ

Search
Research highlight

Engaging the human process in earth science

Sustainability science research suggests that what elevates environmental problems from difficult to seemingly intractable is the role and behaviour of humans, at scales from individual to institutional.

02/06/2018 By BGS Press
Beach plastics
Plastic bottles on a beach. How does this make you feel?

In a(issue 125, 2018), I provided a perspective on engaging the human process in earth science. This reflects a long-lived interest, on my part and others’ across the BGS, in the need to engage earth science (particularly earth-surface sciences) in the development of solutions to so-called ‘wicked’ environmental problems.

If you are interested in learning more about the content of the Research Features article, please see the reference list; I’m also happy to send PDFs on papers that are open access. Send a request to our enquiries team.

There are a couple of concurrent activities that you might be interested in. The first is a special session at the annualFall Meeting of the American Geophysical Unionin December 2018, on the human process in Earth’s future. We are examining the human process in the context of wicked environmental problems.

Sustainability science research suggests that what elevates environmental problems from difficult to seemingly intractable is the role and behaviour of humans, at scales from individual to institutional. Our understanding of the human process within the earth science community, however, is largely cloaked in the disciplines of environmental and global-change science. Complementary analyses of the human process, particularly from a behavioural perspective, are available in the disciplines of sociology, social sciences, behavioural economics, psychology, marketing, business, land-use planning, environmental history, deep geography, and others.

Secondly, we are running workshop (funded by the British Council and the Newton Fund) in Hanoi on cascading coupled human-natural hazards. The human process is critical to understanding how natural hazards and possible disasters cascade through a rural-urban environment.

English countryside
Information icon

The English countryside, made largely by humans.

Expand icon

These are some other relevant and interesting articles that in one way or another address the role of humans in earth sciences. The papers that are connected to the article in Research Features are highlighted inbold text.

  • Armstrong, S B, et al.ΜύΜύ2016.ΜύΜύΜύΜύEarth’s Future, 4(12), 626–635. doi:10.1002/2016EF000425
  • Birkmann, J.ΜύΜύ2011.ΜύΜύΜύΜύNatural Hazards, 58, 811–840. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9806-8
  • Bogard, W C.ΜύΜύ1988.ΜύΜύΜύΜύSociological Perspectives, 31, 147–168. doi:10.2307/1389080
  • Chapman, A D, et al.ΜύΜύ2016.ΜύΜύΜύΜύClimatic Change, 137, 593–608. doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1684-3
  • Collonteur, R A, et al.ΜύΜύ2015.ΜύΜύΜύΜύNatural Hazards, 76, 373–388. doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1496-6
  • Criss, R E, and Shock, E L.ΜύΜύ2001.ΜύΜύΜύΜύGeology, 29, 875–878. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0875:FETFC>2.0.CO;2
  • Di Baldassarre, G, et al.ΜύΜύ2017.ΜύΜύΜύΜύEarth System Dynamics, 8, 225–233. doi:10.5194/esd-8-225-2017
  • Gill, J C, and Malamud, B D.ΜύΜύ2014.ΜύΜύΜύΜύReviews of Geophysics, 52, 680–722. doi:10.1002/2013RG000445
  • Gill, J C, and Malamud, B D.ΜύΜύ2016.ΜύΜύ
  • ΜύΜύEarth-Science Reviews, 166, 246–269. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.01.002
  • Haff, P K.ΜύΜύ2010.ΜύΜύΜύΜύEarth Surface Processes and Landforms, 35, 1157–1166. doi:10.1002/esp.1902
  • Haff, P K.ΜύΜύ2012.ΜύΜύ.ΜύΜύEarth System Dynamics, 3, 149–156. doi:10.5194/esd-3-149-2012
  • Hall, D M, et al.ΜύΜύ2014.ΜύΜύΜύΜύEnvironmental Modelling & Software, 55, 70–76. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.01.007
  • Kawasaki, A, et al.ΜύΜύ2017.ΜύΜύΜύΜύInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 24, 151–159. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.06.004
  • Kreibich, H, et al.ΜύΜύ2017.ΜύΜύΜύΜύEarth’s Future, 5, 953–965. doi:10.1002/2017EF000606
  • Lazarus, E D, et al.ΜύΜύ2011.ΜύΜύΜύΜύNonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 18(6), 989–999. doi:10.5194/npg-18-989-2011
  • Lazarus, E D, et al.ΜύΜύ2016.ΜύΜύΜύΜύGeomorphology, 256, 81–90. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.07.043
  • McNamara, D E, et al.ΜύΜύ2011.ΜύΜύΜύΜύGeophysical Research Letters, 38. doi:10.1029/2011GL047207.
  • Pescaroli, G, and Alexander, D.ΜύΜύ2015.ΜύΜύA definition of cascading disasters and cascading effects: going beyond the ‘toppling dominos’ metaphor. In:Planet@Risk, 2(3): 58–67. (Davos: Global Risk Forum GRF.)
  • Peterson, T R.ΜύΜύ2015.ΜύΜύΜύΜύEuropean Journal of Sustainable Development, 4, 61–76. doi:10.14207/ejsd.2015.v4n2p61
  • Van Loon, A F, et al.ΜύΜύ2016.ΜύΜύΜύΜύNature Geoscience, 9, 89–91. doi:10.1038/ngeo2646
  • Wada, Y, et al.ΜύΜύ2017.ΜύΜύΜύΜύHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21, 4169–4193. doi:10.5194/hess-21-4169-2017.
  • Werner, B T, and McNamara, D E.ΜύΜύ2007.ΜύΜύΜύΜύGeomorphology, 91, 393–407. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.04.020

 

See thefor more.

Contact

Contact our enquiries team for more information.

Was this page helpful?

  • How can we make this section better?*

  • Please select a reason*

  • How can we make this section better?*